Investment Strategy

Q3 2020 Market Review & Outlook: Expect the unexpected

Bull & Bear with masks.jpg

The market’s better-than-expected V-shaped recovery since the spring lockdown was derailed briefly by a September correction that approached 10% in many mega-cap momentum stocks. The S&P 500 index advanced 8.9% and the Wilshire 5000 total market index of U.S. stocks gained 5.54% through Q3.

Outlook: 3 Things to Watch:

As one thinks about the next few months and into 2021, the economy’s outlook is complicated by the election, the path of the pandemic, and the stalemate over the passage of another fiscal stimulus program. Election uncertainty is going to be the dominant issue over the next few weeks.

  1. Election 2020: Déjà vu?:

A Biden presidency and potential Democratic sweep would likely mean higher corporate taxes and higher taxes on investment gains. However, a Democratic boost in federal spending could offset any downside from tax hikes and more regulation, according to many Wall Street strategists.

Trump’s business and brief political history has proven that he’s resilient and has Teflon qualities. And, he could surprise the political pundits again in 2020. The race is still too close to call, and there is a very high risk the election could be unresolved on Election Day — markets would not react favorably to that sort of chaos.

Many of Wall Street strategists believe the current price action in markets is signaling a blue wave. Despite all the theories about the markets’ remarkable V-shaped recovery rooted in political bias, markets are apolitical. They care more about who’s in charge at the Federal Reserve Bank. Indeed, price action has been driven by a supportive Fed coupled with the CARES Act.

As we witnessed in 2016, market players are not particularly good at forecasting how the market will react if a Democrat or Republican wins. History shows that the market will likely do better with two more years of gridlock, no matter who wins the White House.

2. Covid-19 Vaccine:

The year 2020 has been filled with numerous surprises no fiction writer could have contrived. There is still the risk that the second wave of Covid-19 will hit the nation at some point, but the market’s price action does not indicate a willingness to embrace a pessimistic view. It seems that the market is anticipating an effective vaccine, which will likely prevent another shutdown, like the one we saw in the spring. Until a safe vaccine is developed and available, the consumer will be reluctant to spend and travel. Many biotech analysts believe a vaccine could be 80 - 90% effective, worst case 70%. According to market veteran Art Cashin of UBS, the markets may be far too complacent in believing that a highly effective vaccine is imminent. Only time will tell.

3. Stimulus:

The U.S. CARES Act proved to be financially beneficial to those impacted by the pandemic shutdown. But the U.S. economy needs another jolt after suffering through the pandemic, and it cannot recover without it. The Fed has done its job on the monetary side. Its quick and aggressive efforts provided necessary stimulus and liquidity to keep the economy from falling into a deep depression. At $7 trillion, the Fed's balance sheet is bloated, and it cannot stimulate growth and the economy — it can only buy time and provide a floor for market volatility.

In a morning note on October 19, 2020, Joe Weisenthal, an editor at Bloomberg wrote: “This has got to be one of the prime lessons of 2020: When it comes to economic outcomes, the state (at least in the developed world) is incredibly powerful. When the virus came and threatened to obliterate household income this spring, Congress moved quickly and passed the CARES Act — spending trillions of dollars to make up for that. Today, both household net worth and total retail sales are above pre-crisis trends.”

Picture1.png

The second round of stimulus will represent nearly 10% of our annual GDP and turbocharge the recovery. However, neither side seems genuinely interested in helping the economy or the people. It seems they fear the optics of giving the other side a “win” so close to the election. Democrats have been seeking $2.2 trillion in new stimulus, and Senate Republicans have said they would hold new spending closer to $1 trillion. President Trump has offered $1.8 trillion, and it was rejected yet again by Speaker Pelosi.

Stocks & Bonds:

Corporate Earnings:

Due to the pandemic, corporate America is leaner, and it should lead to strong Q3 earnings for many companies outside the oil patch. Quarterly results over the next month and a half will give institutions a chance to decide whether it's time to take profits or put cash back to work and build larger positions.

In a recent Investor’s Business Daily (IBD) article by David Saito-Chung, he quotes a daily note from Steven Ricchiuto, chief economist at Mizuho Securities USA: "These quarterly estimates imply a full-year decline of 18.6%. The same bottoms-up estimates look for a 25.7% rebound in earnings next year. Earnings per share are expected to total $127.70 this year and $165.12 next year. The implied multiple of 25.9x this year is generally seen as compressing to 21.5x in 2021,"

Note: Current lofty valuations in the market can only be justified in the context of a zero interest rate policy (ZIRP), and many stocks, especially technology names, are vulnerable should interest rates start to move higher. Further, Biden’s plan to hike corporate tax will hit earnings. Lower earnings combined with lower multiples isn’t a great formula for higher share prices.

Bond Market: Keep an eye on interest rates.

Real U.S. interest rates (adjusted for inflation) are now negative. The election could impact the bond market, and the make-up of the Senate is a key. Let’s suppose former vice president Joe Biden is elected, and the Senate turns to Democrat control. In that case, markets expect stimulus spending to be much greater leading to a weaker dollar and yields. A weaker dollar would usually be a positive catalyst for equities, particularly large-cap multinationals and energy-based commodities.

Many hedge funds are currently short the dollar, meaning they expect it to weaken in the year ahead. What if they’re on the wrong side of the trade and we begin to experience a stronger dollar?

The yield on the benchmark U.S. Treasury 10-year bond spiked to 0.84% this past week. That marked the highest level since early June. The Fed would like to boost inflation, and they may get their wish, depending on the outcome of the election. An economic recovery is in the future and it’s something that could push yields higher. If we move into a higher inflationary environment, both equities and bonds can go down as bond yields move up. In my opinion, we will eventually get inflation because the Fed’s action has assured it. The big question is: Will job creation and solid growth accompany it, or will we end up with stagflation (no growth and inflation)?

The Bottom Line: Brace for the unexpected

The S&P 500 has been corralled at 3,200 to 3,400 for four weeks. The index moved lower on headlines after the first presidential debate and Trump’s positive Covid-19 test, and each time it has bounced from around 3,300. The S&P 500 closed at 3465.39 on Friday, October 23. The markets are coiling and compressing as they process unexpected events and political election intrigue, building up energy for eventual release, up or down.

Right now, the market is "hoping" that we have a stimulus deal and effective vaccine, but there is a good chance that we do not get either one for some time, at least until after the election. Many market participants are overhedged due to concerns over the second wave of COVID-19, a failure in stimulus negotiations, and election outcomes. As such, we have not witnessed a period of sustained selling pressure. And, the Fed’s aggressive action to help support asset prices have helped dampen volatility.

The VIX (Volatility Index)

One last thought: Will China make good on its promise to purchase $200 billion in U.S. goods, guaranteeing an export boom in 2021? President Trump’s much-touted trade deal has crashed and burned with the Pandemic. His promise to protect American workers from China’s trade practices resonated politically and was almost certainly a decisive factor in his surprising victory in 2016. Under the phase one deal signed in January 2020, China pledged to buy $200 billion of U.S. goods over the next two years, including about $50 billion in two years for oil and gas; $80 billion for engineering equipment; and $32 billion in agricultural products. Since jetliners are the biggest U.S. manufactured export to China, a high-profile Boeing jet purchase would undoubtedly be involved. According to the latest numbers from the Petersen Institute for International Economics: “Through August 2020, China’s year-to-date total imports of covered products from the United States were $56.1 billion, compared with a prorated year-to-date target of $115.1 billion. Over the same period, US exports to China of covered products were $47.6 billion, compared with a year-to-date target of $95.1 billion.”

The markets are banking on a significant reopening of the economy beginning in the first quarter of 2021, with more expansion in the second quarter. Earnings estimates reflect that optimism: S&P 500: 2021 earnings (year-over-year estimates), Q1: up 14%, and Q2: up 44%.

CWM portfolios hold higher cash levels relative to their benchmark model allocations, at this juncture, given my cautious position towards risk assets. For now, the economy’s outlook is complicated by the election, the path of the virus and vaccine news, and a fiscal stimulus program on hold.

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES: This information is educational in nature and is not intended to provide specific investment advice, a financial promotion, or an inducement ,or incitement to participate in any product, offering, or investment. Cambridge Wealth Management is not adopting, making a recommendation for, or endorsing any investment strategy or particular security. The opinions and information expressed herein are obtained from sources believed to be reliable. However, their accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. All data is driven from publicly available information and has not been independently verified by Cambridge Wealth Management, LLC. Some of the conclusions in this report are intended to be generalizations. Any economic forecasts and statements set forth may not develop as predicted and are subject to change. Undue reliance should not be placed on such statements because, by their nature, they are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties. There is no assurance that the views or strategies discussed are suitable for all investors or will yield positive outcomes. Investing involves risks including the risk of possible loss. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

INDEX DESCRIPTIONS:
The following descriptions, while believed to be accurate, are, in some cases abbreviated versions of more detailed or comprehensive definitions available from the sponsors or originators of the respective indices. Anyone interested in such further details is free to consult each such sponsor’s or originator’s website. Each index reflects an unmanaged universe of securities without any deduction for advisory fees or other expenses that would reduce actual returns, as well as the reinvestment of all income and dividends. An actual investment in the securities included in the index could require an investor to incur transaction costs, which would lower the performance results. Indices are not actively managed and investors cannot invest directly in the indices.

S&P 500®: Standard & Poor's (S&P) 500® index. The S&P 500® Index is an unmanaged, capitalization-weighted index designed to measure the broad U.S. economy's performance through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.

COVID-19 Investment Playbook – CWM Special Report

Market corrections happen, but the speed of this decline was the fastest 10%+ one since the Great Depression. The extreme whipsaw moves we witnessed occurred because the market is attempting to reprice risk assets based on outcomes ranging from a brief pause in Q2 economic growth to a global pandemic and recession.

Summary

  • While economic risks are rising, I do not believe the U.S. is heading for a recession or prolonged bear market. Given the risks to Q2 earnings, I am lowering our S&P 500 year-end target from 3400 to 3200.

  • The market was overvalued in certain areas as I stated in our Market Outlook: Investment Themes for 2020, but valuations are not as stretched as they were during the housing bubble and dot-com era. This is not a 2000- or 2008-style correction.

Don’t bet against the Fed

As my brother Michael, an astute economist, stated on March 1: “We are witnessing a supply-driven shock that the world has never experienced before. There’s no playbook for this one.” The novel COVID-19 virus continues to spread outward from China causing widespread fear. The good news is that the Fed and other central banks were proactive, instead of reactive, and moved this past week to stabilize markets by providing additional liquidity. However, it’s not enough. The Fed and the Whitehouse need to embrace a "whatever it takes" mentality. Trading algorithms need to shift from “what if” to “what will” scenarios and this requires a clear plan from our government.

Some market pundits have criticized the Fed’s recent move because they believe monetary policy cannot cure a non-financial “black swan-type” event. However, lower rates will help interest rate-sensitive companies refinance debt — companies that otherwise could find themselves in violation of debt covenants. There are trillions of dollars of debt owed by businesses and refinancing could help a company weather the current storm, potentially taking advantage of opportunities as animal spirits get stirred.

Collapsing oil prices, empty malls, and idling airplanes will have cash flow implications, which could lead to a slowdown in business spending and bankruptcies. However, it’s an overreaction by markets to assume that the global downturn caused by a supply-driven shock and Wuhan virus could lead to a major credit event.

Corporate Profits

Corporate profits likely will come under severe pressure around the world in the months ahead. The sudden oil price collapse and bond market are signaling a global recession. Many market participants fear that we could see more market capitulation in the near-future as Wall Street analysts lower their estimates.

Analysts had conservative forecasts heading into 2020. I noted in Market Outlook: Investment Themes for 2020 that, according to FactSet Earnings Insight, January 10, 2020, “Targets & Ratings: Analysts Project 6% Increase in Price Over Next 12 Months. The bottom-up target price for the S&P 500 is 3,474.50.

Valuations: Cheap or trapdoor?

Investors may be wondering whether the pullbacks represent buying opportunities or a “value trap” that could lead to more losses. While valuations are more attractive than they were a few weeks ago, it’s a secondary consideration to economic fundamentals, which continue to deteriorate.

I continue to reevaluate tactical positions in light of these current weakening fundamentals. Certain investment themes and names that I liked a month ago look even more appealing now. However, longer-term shocks to supply-and-demand could lead to lower valuations for stocks as investors discount future earnings more aggressively due to persistently slower growth.

Strategy and outlook

Time vs. timing the market

We could remain in a choppy market environment for months. Cambridge model portfolios held high cash positions relative to their strategic asset allocation heading into this market meltdown.

I stated in Market Outlook: Key Investment Themes for 2020 that the market was overvalued and current exuberance needed a healthy dose of reality. However, positioning portfolios to their fully invested strategic asset allocation will depend on the containment of the COVID-19 virus over the coming weeks, improving market fundamentals, and a coordinated, clear plan from the White House.

JP Morgan’s global asset strategist, Marko Kolanovic, said in a note to clients on Wednesday: “The hit to the global economy during the first quarter will largely be made up later in the year. The world economy will bounce back quickly from the coronavirus outbreak, and investors should buy into cyclical stocks to catch the comeback.” Indeed, when we do see an eventual rebound, I believe deep cyclical sectors and value styles could outperform.

Market bottoms are impossible to time. But, if one focuses on buying great assets at discounted prices while balancing risk and return, Cambridge Wealth Management’s clients will benefit in the long run.

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES: This information is educational in nature and is not intended to provide specific investment advice, a financial promotion, or an inducement or incitement to participate in any product, offering or investment. Cambridge Wealth Management is not adopting, making a recommendation for or endorsing any investment strategy or particular security. The opinions and information expressed herein are obtained from sources believed to be reliable. However, their accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. All data is driven from publicly available information and has not been independently verified by Cambridge Wealth Management, LLC. Some of the conclusions in this report are intended to be generalizations. Any economic forecasts and statements set forth may not develop as predicted and are subject to change. Undue reliance should not be placed on such statements because, by their nature, they are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties. There is no assurance that the views or strategies discussed are suitable for all investors or will yield positive outcomes. Investing involves risks including possible loss of principal.

INDEX DESCRIPTIONS:
The following descriptions, while believed to be accurate, are in some cases abbreviated versions of more detailed or comprehensive definitions
available from the sponsors or originators of the respective indices. Anyone interested in such further details is free to consult each such sponsor’s or originator’s website. Each index reflects an unmanaged universe of securities without any deduction for advisory fees or other expenses that would reduce actual returns, as well as the reinvestment of all income and dividends. An actual investment in the securities included in the index could require an investor to incur transaction costs, which would lower the performance results. Indices are not actively managed and investors cannot invest directly in the indices.

S&P 500®: Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500®) index. The S&P 500® Index is an unmanaged, capitalization-weighted index designed to measure the performance of the broad US economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.

Market outlook: Investment Themes for 2020

Tokyo Bay

Tokyo Bay

A year ago, few could have imagined the S&P 500 delivering a gain of more than 31.5% in 2019 (including dividends) with flat earnings. Volatility was extreme in Q4 2018 and a sell-off in December 2018 left the S&P 500 near bear market territory (defined as a 20% decline from its closing peak). Accounting for compounding returns, the near 20% decline suffered by the S&P 500 in Q4 2018 required a 25% rebound to get back to even.

Throughout 2019, we went from concerns of a bear market to recovery only to have recession fears resurface in the third quarter as trade friction and China’s slowing economy rattled markets. We began Q4 2019 at about S&P 500 2930 level — the market treaded water, so to speak, for nearly 18 months.


2019 performance for key indices:

Equity market:

• S&P 500: 31.5% (including dividends)
• MSCI EAFE: (index of developed market economies): 22%
• MSCI Emerging Markets Index: 18.5%

Bond market:

• Barclays U.S Aggregate Index: 8.7%
Intermediate-term municipal bonds: 5.7%

Real assets:

• Spot gold returned 18.5%.
• REITs gained more than 20%.
Note: UBS tracks 18 asset classes to include in its year-end investor report, and all asset classes reported positive returns compared to only two in 2018 (cash and bonds).

Apple and Microsoft accounted for nearly 15% (almost half including dividends) of the S&P 500 index returns in 2019.

Top Contributors_2019.png


A change of heart at the Fed

So, what changed to finally break the market’s range-bound movement? Our president stopped tweeting about the U.S.- China trade war. Seriously: Much of the stock market’s gains in 2019 can be attributed to a dramatic policy shift at the Federal Reserve.

In 2018, the Fed raised rates four times, including a December 2018 hike that took its key rate to 2.5%, sending a major shockwave throughout global markets. However, in 2019, the Fed lowered rates three times, in one-quarter percentage point steps, due to concerns over a slowing global economy tied to trade war concerns and lackluster business spending. And for an added safety measure, the Fed announced the buying of Treasury bills in September to stabilize the short-term repo market. The Fed’s intervention injected the market with an extra boost to liquidity and investor confidence.

GDP Chart.png

Gross domestic product (GDP) in the U.S. is expected to slow to about 2.0% in 2020, down from 2.2% in 2019 and well off the “sugar highs” induced by the 2017 tax cut package.


Trade deals Signed

We spent much of the year being whipsawed by the U.S.- China trade war headlines and our president’s erratic tweets on the subject.

As the year came to a close, the House passed the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, which is President Trump’s replacement for NAFTA. Equally important, the Trump administration came to a phase-one trade agreement with China. All in all, very welcome news for markets.

Trump’s China tariffs and the uncertainty surrounding them were troubling U.S. businesses that have built supply chains in China or that rely on Chinese imports. Their concerns were a reason U.S. businesses’ capital investment fell throughout the year.

pmi_vs_sp500_2019.png


Looking ahead: Key themes for 2020

Corporate earnings: Paying up

As we enter 2020, markets are riding high. Indeed, the mood is ebullient as we experience a continued “melt-up” in markets. The market rally has been driven by expectations of a snap-back in earnings growth and a synchronized global economic recovery.

Price/earnings (P/E) ratios rose to 18.3 forward earnings for the S&P 500 from 15.6 a year ago. The P/E multiple expansion resulted from a decline in interest rates. Are markets expensive? Multiplying the current P/E of 18.4 times the consensus S&P earnings estimate for 2020 of $177.88 results in an index level of 3,202. Based on these forecasts, the market is overvalued at current levels.

According to FactSet Earnings Insight, January 10, 2020:
Targets & Ratings: Analysts Project 6% Increase in Price Over Next 12 Months. The bottom-up target price for the S&P 500 is 3474.50. At the sector level, the Energy (+12.7%) sector is expected to see the largest price increase, as this sector has the largest upside difference between the bottom-up target price and the closing price. On the other hand, the Information Technology (+1.7%) sector is expected to see the smallest price increase.”

Earnings growth estimates were down drastically this past year. Analysts estimated S&P 500 earnings growth for the year would be around 7.6%, according to FactSet. That number is now about 0.3% or flat.

A key theme to watch in 2020 will be companies ability to continue to grow earnings and meet current expectations.

Portfolio implications for 2020:
Sector profit margins at risk of earning misses are Consumer Staples, Industrials, Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Basic Materials sectors where 25% tariffs on $250 billion array of Chinese industrial goods and components used by U.S. manufacturers remain in place. Note: The fierce rotation into value that began in September, led by major banks like JP Morgan (a beneficiary of the U.S.-China Trade deal) still has room to run.

Some key earnings forecasts to watch this month: Apple, Amazon, and Boeing.
The market has bid up Apple shares, anticipating strong growth from Services. Some analysts are predicting production cuts in March for the iPhone 11 line (iPhone 11 Pro retails for $1149) in Chinese markets due to low demand and increasing headwinds from aggressive 5g smartphone launches in China by Huawei. Apple has fallen behind Asian competitors in its 5g product launch.

Deglobalization or Fair Trade?

What began as campaign rhetoric became reality when president Trump announced his trade reform agenda at the World Economic Forum at Davos in January 2018. He stated: “The United States will no longer turn a blind eye to unfair economic practices, including massive intellectual property theft, industrial subsidies, and pervasive state-led economic planning. These and other predatory behaviors are distorting the global markets and harming businesses and workers, not just in the U.S., but around the globe…The United States is prepared to negotiate mutually beneficial, bilateral trade agreements with all countries.

A phase-one trade deal is important from a psychological perspective because it removes some of the fog of uncertainty clouding business activity for the current fiscal year. A phase-two trade deal with China will not be negotiated until after the 2020 elections. Going forward, we should see a pickup in capital expenditures.

Overseas, growth continues to be more challenging than in the U.S, but green-shoots are emerging and valuations are attractive. The U.K. is expected to negotiate a favorable trade agreement with continental Europe and a soft-landing for Brexit is now widely anticipated.

Portfolio implications for 2020
Trade wars, tariffs, and talk of more tariffs have created a cautious business atmosphere, restraining investment, and concomitant global growth. While a phase-one deal has provided clarity for businesses, trade will remain a top policy issue throughout 2020 and beyond.

In November 2019, the FCC labeled Huawei and ZTE a national security threat and cut Federal funding going to equipment from these companies. Huawei, now the world’s largest telecommunications equipment manufacturer and second-largest smartphone manufacturer, is currently appealing the ban, deeming it unconstitutional. Additionally, the Trump administration has banned U.S companies from doing business with Huawei. In November, the U.S gave Huawei a third 90-day support window that allows current Huawei customers to continue to receive support for existing devices from U.S companies who apply for a “general export license.” The U.S. is also requesting Meng Wanzhou, Huawei’s CFO, be extradited and tried for fraud.

Huawei map.png

Countries and companies that rely heavily on exports who adapt quickly to this changing trade dynamic as they plan capital expenditures and rethink their supply chains will fare better than those who don’t. Earnings for Google Mobile Services(GMS) and certain semiconductor manufacturers could be negatively impacted should the U.S. fail to grant Huawei a fourth 90-day support window. Note: Chinese companies stockpiled U.S. semiconductors in 2018, but inventories are now running low. Huawei is developing their own mobile services, called HMS, to replace Google.

The Fed and Central Banks: On hold?

It appears the recent rate cuts by our Fed have been enough to extend the economic cycle. Bond yields generally remain in their lowest decile relative to history thanks to easy monetary policy and subdued credit conditions. While the Fed is usually on hold during an election year, it may be forced to cut rates again due to concerns over a slowing economy and cautious business spending.

Portfolio Implications for 2020
Interest rates should remain range-bound with the 10-year U.S. Treasury bond trading between a yield of 1.75% and 2.0%. The current rate environment will continue to support an elevated P/E ratio of 18. Companies should continue to take advantage of low rates and buy back shares of their stock, helping boost prices as supply is reduced. Unlike the rally in 2019, Bond returns will likely remain constrained due to dovish central banks and soft global growth. Investors should stick with investment-grade corporates for taxable accounts and avoid reaching for yield this late in the cycle.

U.S. Elections: Facebook, Google, Healthcare, and Energy in focus

First, a word about impeachment. The consensus view is that the current situation is similar to president Bill Clinton's impeachment in 1998, which didn’t affect markets. Perhaps the current impeachment proceeding is more about the Democrats taking control of the Senate? Four Republican senators are at risk: Martha McSally (Arizona), Cory Gardner (Colorado), Joni Ernst (Iowa), and Susan Collins (Maine).

As always, the big wild card to market forecasts this year will be the 2020 elections, though markets likely won’t focus on this X-factor until June. I should note, even though the market’s performance has generally been positive in election years, the gains usually come later.

Many things are going right. With central banks now acting in sync with each other and new trade deals in place, talks of a synchronized global recovery have resurfaced. Improving corporate earnings, business confidence, and an accommodative Fed should help drive market gains in 2020. In all, I expect a good year for financial markets, but as always, I’m prepared for the inevitable surprises that could impact my outlook. Trade frictions with China centered on Huawei and their CFO could heat up again in March as business support exemptions expire, giving current exuberance a healthy dose of reality.

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES: This material is for general information only and is not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. The opinions and information expressed herein are obtained from sources believed to be reliable. However, their accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. All data is driven from publicly available information and has not been independently verified by Cambridge Wealth Management, LLC. Opinions expressed are current as of the date of this publication and are subject to change. Some of the conclusions in this report are intended to be generalizations. There is no assurance that the views or strategies discussed are suitable for all investors or will yield positive outcomes. Investing involves risks including possible loss of principal. Any economic forecasts set forth may not develop as predicted and are subject to change.

INDEX DESCRIPTIONS:
The following descriptions, while believed to be accurate, are in some cases abbreviated versions of more detailed or comprehensive definitions
available from the sponsors or originators of the respective indices. Anyone interested in such further details is free to consult each such sponsor’s or originator’s website. Each index reflects an unmanaged universe of securities without any deduction for advisory fees or other expenses that would reduce actual returns, as well as the reinvestment of all income and dividends. An actual investment in the securities included in the index could require an investor to incur transaction costs, which would lower the performance results. Indices are not actively managed and investors cannot invest directly in the indices.

S&P 500®: Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500®) index. The S&P 500® Index is an unmanaged, capitalization-weighted index designed to measure the performance of the broad US economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.

U.S.-China Trade War: Could it get any uglier?

A day will come when there will be no battlefields, but markets opening to commerce and minds opening to ideas.
— Victor Hugo

Trade tensions between the United States and China show no signs of simmering down. A new round of U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports kicked in on August 22. The U.S. began collecting an additional 25 percent in duties on $16 billion in Chinese import product categories including semiconductors, chemicals, and motorbikes, just to name a few. These latest American tariffs come on the heels of $34 billion in Chinese goods duties levied at 25 percent, which were implemented in July.

Beijing immediately retaliated with tariffs of their own on $16 billion worth of additional imports from the U.S. including fuel, steel products, autos, and medical equipment.
 

In brief:

  • Basic materials, industrials, and emerging markets have all taken a hit in recent months due to the trade wars. Turbulence will be around for awhile particularly in emerging markets.

  • Markets should expect bilateral tit-for-tat trade actions to continue for the foreseeable future for both the U.S. and China. With approaching midterms, China is playing a waiting game.

  • The objective is to reduce the size of the U.S. - China trade deficit from an estimated $370 billion to $200 billion by 2020 and eliminate unfair trade practices noted below.

August 6, 2018 - prior to recent round of 16b in tariffs

August 6, 2018 - prior to recent round of 16b in tariffs


The issues:

At the core of the trade war issues on the U.S. side are concerns over technology infringement and alleged widespread intellectual property (IP) theft by the Chinese. This comes from three activities:

  • Corporate espionage,

  • Cyber-theft, and

  • Technology transfer to the Chinese in exchange for market access.

The Commission on the Theft of American Intellectual Property estimates that China's purported IP theft costs the U.S. between $225 billion and $600 billion each year. http://ipcommission.org

China has denied Washington's allegations that it essentially forces the unfair transfer of U.S. technology in exchange for market access and insists it adheres to World Trade Organization rules.

Instead of tit-for-tat trade tariff retaliation with the U.S., China should follow South Korea's lead and accept to bring down their large surplus on American trades and rebalance a relationship that has served them so well.


The art of the deal

The prevailing wisdom on President Trump's trade tactics is that he's making major negotiation errors in his attacks on China and that nobody can win a trade war. Regardless of the Trump administration’s current trade war strategy with China, I think that things could change quickly for China in the coming months leading to two very different potential market outcomes in Q4. China wants U.S. business interests to pressure President Trump, and it’s betting on scenario one below.

Scenario 1: A “Blue Wave” in the House this November gives the Democrats a mandate to impeach Trump if the Special Counsel report proves some form of perjury or Russian collusion. President Trump is likely to survive indictment in the Senate, but "Never Trump" Republicans could vote to replace him with Vice President Mike Pence. Note: The billionaire Koch brothers have financed the Vice President’s political career, and therefore, he would likely carry their “free trade” globalist torch.

Scenario 2: The Special Counsel finds no Russian Collusion or wrongdoing by the Trump administration, there’s a “Red Wave” in November midterms, and President Trump is given the mandate to move forward with his populist agenda and impose tariffs on a total of $500 billion of Chinese imports.

So, what’s the real U.S. endgame in this trade war with China? It's this: Redirect global supply chains to favor American manufacturers; pressure China to open its market to Americans with no strings attached; reduce the trade deficit, and challenge Chinese dominance in Asia.
 

The bottom line:

Shangai index 620x-1.png

China's President Xi Jinping is feeling the heat and it looks like he may have overreached. Trade tensions have exposed vulnerabilities in China's slowing economy, and it’s making investors nervous. A tanking Chinese stock market and resulting investment outflows could lead to an uptick in emerging market bond yields and the winter of discontent in China. Even worse, a full-blown trade war would have stagflationary consequences globally.

A few days ago, veteran Wall Street trader Art Cashin of UBS mentioned on CNBC that markets seem to be pricing in the “Pence Put.” A put is a option contract giving the owner the right to to sell a specified amount of an underlying security at a specified price within a certain time frame, limiting downside market risk. Either the market is looking beyond the trade war and midterm elections and pricing in a "Pence Put" or it's having a lagging reaction to significant regulatory rollback and Trump's Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA).

The future is capricious (especially in the Trump era), which is partially the reason why markets exist in the first place. The market conditions that led to February’s spike in the VIX (volatility index) — rising rates, less liquidity, and hedge funds being caught wrong-footed — are still there. With the unprecedented confluence of political and trade events added to these pre-existing conditions, the likelihood of a spike in volatility calls for underweighting equities relative to their strategic asset allocation and holding higher levels of cash. Depending on the outcome of the November midterms and the Mueller investigation, the U.S. - China trade war could get even uglier in the months ahead as trade policy scripts get torn up and rewritten.
 

Sources: Wall Street Journal Online; Bloomberg News; Investor’s Business Daily; Forbes.com; CNBC News; Reuters News; The Economist.

The information contained in this piece is intended for information only and should not be considered investment advice. Please contact your financial adviser with questions about your specific needs and circumstances.

The information and opinions expressed herein are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however their accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. All data are driven from publicly available information and has not been independently verified by Cambridge Wealth Management, LLC. Opinions expressed are current as of the date of this publication and are subject to change. Certain statements contained within are forward-looking statements including, but not limited to, predictions or indications of future events, trends, plans or objectives. Undue reliance should not be placed on such statements because, by their nature, they are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties.